An Ohio State University janitor who was about to lose his job walked into a maintenance building for his early morning shift this month and shot his two supervisors, killing one of them and fatally shooting himself.

Shocking details continue to emerge about the Feb. 12 shooting spree at the University of Alabama. Biology professor Amy Bishop is accused of shooting and killing three colleagues, and wounding three others during a faculty meeting, according to numerous wire service news reports.

These are the latest in a tragic nationwide pattern of workplace violence that appears to grow as our nation’s struggling economy places financial stress on families, layoffs continue to occur and employee workloads increase.

The Alabama shooting is a textbook case of what can happen when a business’ background-checking appears to be lacking and when behavioral problems are not addressed quickly.

These tragedies and others remind us that business owners, supervisors and employees must work together to create a safe, violent-free, conflict-controlled workplace.

It begins with hiring qualified employees after backgrounds are verified and previous employment confirmed. It continues with

stablishing and enforcing policies and procedures that do not tolerate violence. This includes establishing practices that deal with workplace conflict, rather than letting it fester. A key component is a training program that identifies early warning signs of potentially violent behavior and appropriate steps for co-workers and supervisors to take.

A Harvard-educated professor, Bishop was told last year she would not be granted tenure at the University of Alabama at Huntsville. She was encouraged to find another job. This fueled her hostility toward colleagues on a campus where she was known for her “cyclical flip-outs,” The New York Times reported.

Reportedly when the university hired her in 2003, officials did not know about her background: In 1986, the then 21-year-old Bishop shot and killed her 18-year-old brother, wire service news reports say. The shooting was called accidental. In 1994, she and her husband were questioned in a mail bomb plot against a colleague at Harvard. In 2002, she was charged with assaulting a woman at a restaurant, the news reports say.

Although she arrived at the University of Alabama with prestigious recommendations, her explosive behavior soon reappeared, causing students to avoid her classes, according to numerous wire service news reports.

No doubt university officials wish they had done a more thorough job of investigating Bishop’s background before hiring her. But when they received complaints about her behavior, they took nearly six years to deny her tenure and advise her to move along.

Too often when we encounter disruptive workplace behavior, we want to ignore it and hope problems will move along. Most often this strategy just doesn’t work.

The U.S. Department of Labor Statistics reported 628 people died in workplace homicides in 2007. In addition to the tragic loss of lives, the costs associated with workplace violence include lost business, lower productivity, medical expenses, higher insurance rates, negative publicity and litigation. The American Journal of Industrial Medicine estimated costs of workplace violence from 1992 to 2001 to be $6.5 billion.

No community is immune. If a workplace tragedy can occur in Huntsville, Ala., a city about half the size of Bakersfield, it can happen here.

For example, just last year, the Bakersfield office of a major corporation made headlines when a former employee drove recklessly through the company’s parking lot, threatening company officials over a disability insurance dispute. Security barriers were erected to protect workers and the man was sent to jail.

Likely at one time or another, we all have worked with someone who had a hot temper and threatening manner. Perhaps we feared violence. Did we confront the coworker, ask managers to intervene, or report concerns to human resources or a company ombudsman?

Business owners must establish clear policies that ban disruptive behavior. These policies must be consistently enforced. Procedures for reporting conflicts and disruptive behavior must be established. Steps that include counseling and mediation must be included in the company’s disciplinary action program. Supervisors and workers must receive conflict resolution training.

The Bakersfield Police Department recognizes workplace violence as a real threat. It has posted a brochure on its webpage www.bakersfieldcity.us/police outlining “red flag behavior” and response tips.

Human resources consulting firms offer supervisors and workers training, and assist in developing policies and procedures to address workplace violence. Ignoring violent or disruptive behavior is not an option.

Wpg Auto Financing

Resolution Mediation

http://www.resolutionmediation.net

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • How To Get A Business Loan To obtain approval for your small business loan application, you should be able to meet the lending criteria set. Some organizations are more risk reluctant than others and thus have more strict criteria. To greatly increase the chances of a...
  • Beginning To Attain Additional Cash With A Web Based Business I am sure you have looked at many websites that have offered you opportunities to attain cash on the internet. It may look to be a very great program that is really easy to do. It is like you discovered...
  • The Basics of Golf Etiquette When it comes to playing golf, a major portion of the game isn’t your swing, or how far you can drive, it’s how well you can follow the unspoken rules of the game. Golf etiquette has been largely forgotten by...
  • A Summary of the Credit CARD Act of 2009–Pt4 Free credit reports have become a popular topic over the last few years. To the point of having close to a dozen songs written about a particular website that claims to offer free credit reports. There are many misleading advertisements,...
  • How to Become a Serious Coin Collector There are two different types of coin collectors in this world: those who are serious about their collecting, and those who collect for simple enjoyment. While serious collectors do get enjoyment out of coin collecting, they are much more serious...